Poll: Do you want to spend a bit more money and make the L4D server public? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
Yes (will donate) | 5 | 25.00% | |
Yes (no donate) | 11 | 55.00% | |
No | 4 | 20.00% | |
Total | 20 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
CaffeinePowered Mad Hatter Posts: 12,998 Joined: Mar 2008 |
01-25-2009, 06:10 PM
Just curious, I should be able to tie it to the steam group so that when the party leader is searching for a server the party will go to it first, but people would be able to join mid game (randoms that is)
 Sig by Joel |
||
|
rumsfald Guest |
01-25-2009, 07:27 PM
I was all hot for L4D a while ago, but kinda burned through it. Since they make it such a pain to play on servers you like, it kinda seems pointless to shell out dough for a L4D server to advertise the community. I wish it were otherwise.
|
||
|
Geoff Real World Azn Posts: 3,921 Joined: Apr 2008 |
01-25-2009, 08:35 PM
Can we get a COD5 server plz?
(10-06-2011, 04:24 AM)Vandamguy link Wrote:just ignore everything Geoff posts its always trolling or ignorant drivel |
||
|
Honest Ignoooore Meee, kupo Posts: 2,334 Joined: Sep 2008 |
01-25-2009, 09:12 PM
I think Caff's point is not really advertisement, but just putting people in the servers when we play games so that when people ragequit midway we have some bodies to fill it up with. Good being what I just said, bad being server might be taken when we try and play a game.
Advertising on L4D is like advertising on the outside of a bus. The only people who are even going to see it are too busy to care. (05-10-2009, 07:39 PM)Radio Raheem link Wrote:in the straightest way possible i have to say honest is by far the best looking person here |
||
|
Vongore The Chilean God of Lightning Posts: 3,371 Joined: Jul 2008 |
01-25-2009, 09:46 PM
(01-25-2009, 08:35 PM)Geoff link Wrote: Can we get a COD5 server plz? no Also WaW is just 4.3, not 5 |
||
|
Geoff Real World Azn Posts: 3,921 Joined: Apr 2008 |
01-25-2009, 09:47 PM
(01-25-2009, 09:46 PM)Vongore link Wrote: [quote author=Geoff link=topic=2216.msg63254#msg63254 date=1232933735] no Also WaW is just 4.3, not 5 [/quote] :< They has ruskies (10-06-2011, 04:24 AM)Vandamguy link Wrote:just ignore everything Geoff posts its always trolling or ignorant drivel |
||
|
CaffeinePowered Mad Hatter Posts: 12,998 Joined: Mar 2008 |
01-25-2009, 09:58 PM
(01-25-2009, 09:12 PM)Honest link Wrote: I think Caff's point is not really advertisement, but just putting people in the servers when we play games so that when people ragequit midway we have some bodies to fill it up with. Good being what I just said, bad being server might be taken when we try and play a game. Well no one uses the private server at this time This is mainly due to Valve's lunkheadedness more than anything, but continuing to pay for a private server that no one uses I might as well flush money down the toilet. Its not a good use of everyone that donated money. If its set to public we can do normal lobbies and have people possibly join mid round. The biggest complaint I have about private servers is that there is no lobby to go back to, so even if people want to continue playing, it all gets broken up I would like more people to vote on this though, if you play L4D at all you should probably vote. Â Sig by Joel |
||
|
rumsfald Guest |
01-25-2009, 10:14 PM
(01-25-2009, 09:58 PM)CaffeinePowered link Wrote: This is mainly due to Valve's lunkheadedness There's my vote. Even when I played L4D every night, the server mechanic was so crappy I just wound up playing on the first acceptable random server. |
||
|
CaffeinePowered Mad Hatter Posts: 12,998 Joined: Mar 2008 |
01-25-2009, 10:21 PM
(01-25-2009, 10:14 PM)rumsfald link Wrote: [quote author=CaffeinePowered link=topic=2216.msg63272#msg63272 date=1232938692] There's my vote. Even when I played L4D every night, the server mechanic was so crappy I just wound up playing on the first acceptable random server. [/quote] I believe they have patched it somewhat when it comes to looking for a server and the order goes something like this 1) Steam Group Associated (Lobby Leader) 2) Best Ping (Local of leader) 3) Best Ping (region) 4) Best ping (global) Â Sig by Joel |
||
|
Surf314 Seriously, this week I'll play PS Posts: 12,078 Joined: Mar 2008 |
01-26-2009, 09:38 AM
Here's the quick and dirty:
Benefits -Easier to join our server (no password) -Easier to find our server (shows up in steam group) -Steamgroup exclusive means we get first crack at our server when empty -Pubs can join when not empty to fill it up Detractors -A bit of extra money -May have to kick some pubs every once in a while -Pubs have a habit of bitching about everything -They can be griefers -I hate 90% of pubs -At least they can only join when we've already started a game with less than 4 people |
||
|
CaffeinePowered Mad Hatter Posts: 12,998 Joined: Mar 2008 |
01-26-2009, 12:27 PM
I really would like more than 8 people to vote on this
 Sig by Joel |
||
|
Chooly BRB, Posting Posts: 768 Joined: Mar 2008 |
01-27-2009, 12:34 AM
I voted to make the server public, I also would donate. There isn't much of an argument against opening the server up to pubs apart from a full server when everyone wants to play.
But, considering the number of servers available for random matches ours being full all the time is unlikely. This is also something easy enough to solve by having an admin "boot all" script. Just because the server is public doesn't warrant making it any less exclusive. [table][tr][td] [/td][td]Chooly: /nevergonnagiveyouup Eschatos: /nevergonnaletyoudown [TC] Versus: /nevergonnarunaround [TC] Versus: /anddesertyou ToiletDuck: /closeapplication[/td][/tr][/table] |
||
|
copulatingduck Following in Gordon's Footsteps Posts: 7,518 Joined: Apr 2008 |
01-27-2009, 01:10 AM
Boot all script would certainly discourage people from favoriting the server though. :-\
Ripped like paper raped with ease hey scrub nerd pyros suck on these |
||
|
Trace Killing anything that twitches Posts: 1,427 Joined: Oct 2008 |
01-27-2009, 01:20 AM
Voted yes (will donate)Â ;D
|
||
|
CaffeinePowered Mad Hatter Posts: 12,998 Joined: Mar 2008 |
01-27-2009, 05:53 AM
Server hopefully should be public today, we'll see how this goes
 Sig by Joel |
||
|
x BRB, Posting Posts: 646 Joined: Oct 2008 |
01-27-2009, 06:51 AM
(01-27-2009, 01:10 AM)CopulatingDuck link Wrote: Boot all script would certainly discourage people from favoriting the server though. :-\ The exclusivity vibe in a lot of recent threads would suggest people don't care. I'm not gonna argue that point here as the irony of the anti-pub crowd has been pointed out numerous times but setting the server to public will mean that pubs will be playing on it. If they're going to get kicked every time an existing community member wants to play, it becomes an exercise in futility. Also, it seems to be a fairly common occurrence to get kicked (with accompanying temp ban) upon joining a server if a few people are on and just want to play with each other. While this is a bit of a dick move, it is kinda understandable and I would say it's just something to grin and bear. If the perpetrators are allowed to continue playing, there's always a chance they'll enjoy the server and maybe look to joining the group/forums/etc. Not sure how that will sit with some members though. |
||
|
CaffeinePowered Mad Hatter Posts: 12,998 Joined: Mar 2008 |
01-27-2009, 08:27 AM
(01-27-2009, 06:51 AM)Arnies Right Bicep link Wrote: [quote author=CopulatingDuck link=topic=2216.msg63523#msg63523 date=1233036652] The exclusivity vibe in a lot of recent threads would suggest people don't care. I'm not gonna argue that point here as the irony of the anti-pub crowd has been pointed out numerous times but setting the server to public will mean that pubs will be playing on it. If they're going to get kicked every time an existing community member wants to play, it becomes an exercise in futility. Also, it seems to be a fairly common occurrence to get kicked (with accompanying temp ban) upon joining a server if a few people are on and just want to play with each other. While this is a bit of a dick move, it is kinda understandable and I would say it's just something to grin and bear. If the perpetrators are allowed to continue playing, there's always a chance they'll enjoy the server and maybe look to joining the group/forums/etc. Not sure how that will sit with some members though. [/quote] I believe L4D and TF2 present very different gaming environments, I would think that in L4D if you have a few pubbies playing with you, it will come down to their individual conduct. I am not going to give out admin to more than a tiny handful of people and there will be no reserve or booting plugin, in fact, I can't put something up like TF2 since the maximum size of a server I can set up is 8, I can't make a hidden "9th" connection slot. In my view at least, it would come down to this, if a pub is being a team player, they would not be vote kicked, but if you have a friend who wants to play and you have someone in game who is either downright terrible and not a team player, you'd probably boot them. Also since is probably going to come up at some point, if you get vote kicked from a server it places a temp ban of I believe 30 min on you, don't come asking me to undo that ban, since its going to go away by the time I'd get to it anyway. Â Sig by Joel |
||
|
ScottyGrayskull Unbalancer of the Internet Posts: 1,718 Joined: Mar 2008 |
01-27-2009, 09:49 AM
(01-27-2009, 08:27 AM)CaffeinePowered link Wrote: Also since is probably going to come up at some point, if you get vote kicked from a server it places a temp ban of I believe 30 min on you, don't come asking me to undo that ban, since its going to go away by the time I'd get to it anyway. I wonder if the message informing the player they were kicked can be changed to include that bit. That'd be handy to know as I'm sure it'd freak out some people. Caffeine`brb!u: /facepalm Caffeine`brb!u: you have the technological ability of Dede Caffeine`brb!u: OOOOOOO what does this button do Caffeine`brb!u: *break* Caffeine`brb!u: SCOTTY GET OUT OF MY SERVER |
||
|
Surf314 Seriously, this week I'll play PS Posts: 12,078 Joined: Mar 2008 |
01-27-2009, 09:58 AM
If it becomes hard to get into our own server all we have to do is set it to steamgroup exclusive. This means that only people in our steamgroup can start playing on it, then if there are some slots left they go to any pubs that want it. When the game is over everyone gets booted anyways so it can't stay full without BRBUers.
|
||
|
Chooly BRB, Posting Posts: 768 Joined: Mar 2008 |
01-27-2009, 01:20 PM
(01-27-2009, 09:58 AM)Surf314 link Wrote: If it becomes hard to get into our own server all we have to do is set it to steamgroup exclusive. This means that only people in our steamgroup can start playing on it, then if there are some slots left they go to any pubs that want it. When the game is over everyone gets booted anyways so it can't stay full without BRBUers. This [table][tr][td] [/td][td]Chooly: /nevergonnagiveyouup Eschatos: /nevergonnaletyoudown [TC] Versus: /nevergonnarunaround [TC] Versus: /anddesertyou ToiletDuck: /closeapplication[/td][/tr][/table] |
||
|
|